@Sic and @ChatWithThisName none of this is trying to flame. I am just trying to help make a good product better. There is some code in mq2clerics thats driven clerics to try and buff pets with an out dated spell. I might of over reached for swarm pets but i know for damn sure its trying to buff my rangers pet that procs from his Scimitar of the Mistwalker.
As for the TLP, Rizlona is the true TLP. (I don't know what that means) Also no other automations running unless the Russians hacked me.
"Might have over reached". Well giving blatantly bad information is just going to get me to ignore your post. If you post something that is flat out a lie/wrong, I can't help you. Please don't waste our time.
No one said you were flaming, take a chill pill. :p And your "I just want to make a good product better" sounds antagonistic. Neither chat or i thought you're flaming or coming for a fight. in the "please read this sticky" there is a "how to get help" which explains how to best get help - chat was asking you to rephrase your message into a question because he often doesn't want to assume he understands what is being asked, and doesn't mind waiting for a reply before digging deep. I personally will end up just refreshing over and over waiting for a reply, so i often/usually/always? end up giving an answer based on the information provided
Block any spell on pets you don't want.
We only buff "actual pets" anything that would be an F1 "target my pet that I have a pet window pet" for. That is a pet, and we buff that. Swarm pets aren't F1 pets, and we don't buff them.
Mq/eq has some weird stacking in the mid-levels, where stuff will say it is missing and stacks, so we'll cast it.
This is explained in the FAQ.
Each single target and group spell line that we use, we keep info on those spells. We buff first with our group spell (hopefully hitting pets) and then check if any pets need a buff, and then only cast the single target version on them.
We cast single target buffs on pets if mq says they're missing it and can stack.
Block anything you don't want.
re: the actual spells
the "Aegolism" group has gallantry, the "GroupAegolism" would have Hand of Gallantry
Unless you're missing spells, we would no longer be memorizing and casting Conviction.
If you are missing tenacity, temerity, and gallantry, then we would be trying to case the "Aegolism" spell we know, which would be Conviction.
When the plugin loads you can see what spells are in what spell group.
If you're missing spells, you should go get them.
If you're not missing spells (and not manually memorizing Conviction, as there is some help for lower level and / byos to memorize a few buffs that we just say "do we have this buff memorized, let's check if anyone needs it" --- in which case, don't memorize it), please show me a snip of your plugin output showing your Aegolism and GroupAegolism groups, as well as a snippet of the plugin casting it on a pet, because that doesn't appear something possible