@RobRenfro glad you finally saw the light my friend. I hit the same wall years ago when @Sic was beating his head agaisn't my wall of moving to a tank led philosophy...I had too much Mage & Necro in my DNA...took a fair amount of logic smack downs from @Sic, @william12, and @Knightly for me to finally understand every class has its place.
That's what I always need to do. Argue less and listen more. Great advice as usual.@RobRenfro glad you finally saw the light my friend. I hit the same wall years ago when @Sic was beating his head agaisn't my wall of moving to a tank led philosophy...I had too much Mage & Necro in my DNA...took a fair amount of logic smack downs from @Sic, @william12, and @Knightly for me to finally understand every class has its place.
In general terms...wish I'd argued less and listened more...much much much more efficient and effective to drive with your tank ...
You're totally right and I would never argue otherwise. But you gotta admit that sometimes it is fun to play a less efficient group for a little challenge.
idk im pretty partial to monks@monsy oh thats an easy one! just make her your main and have the rest of your group automatedTheres no class more fun to actively play than bard!
but i do auto around the bard now 
shes a lot of fun too!
@RobRenfro I made my first ever bard and used SIC's level 110 bard ini. And I used it until I turned 115. Then I updated to the 115 bard ini. Then I used the 115 until I got to 120 and then updated to the 120. Repeat at 125. I didn't want to be bothered with updating it each level with the new spells as I got them. I was hunting a COV to 115 and then I went to UP and picked a spot with no named mobs and went to 120. So not having the upper level spells werent a detriment to my ability to level and AA. THen from 120-125 I leveled and AA'd each level, so updating the ini with the new spells each level made more sense to me.
