Question - CWTN Plugins VS KA or RGMercs (2 Viewers)

[Killertoxin]

Hello Frens,

I am wondering about MQ2Berzerker, MQ2Cleric and so on. I am currently using KA11 with a bard, warrior, cleric, mage, berzerker. So I have watched Sic's videos on the matter and I was thinking about getting them. However, they are paid premium plugins and to get warrior, cleric and berzerker is about the same as all my eq accounts each month. So to the question.... Why buy these premium plugins ? Are they better then KA11 ? I am leaning towards getting them I just dont want to buy them and wind up not using them because the differences between the two and not significant enough. Any thoughts would be appreciated as they may aleive my indecision.

 

[Setsuni]

I use a mixture of CWTN and RGmercs.

I like to think of them as apple vs android.

CWTN is the apple of a combat routine. Super simple, very plug and play and executes well at what it's supposed to do. A complete newbie could use it and have no issues.
RGmercs is the android of combat routines. It works great and has a ton of options and other potential uses that can be expanded and combined on.

Perfect example - I use CWTN for my SK and SHM but RGmercs for the rest of the group. I will even switch out to RGmercs for my SK and SHM if I am doing a multi hunter kind of scenario. I like some of the flexibility with RG mercs for melee, where I don't need to face to assist. I want to melee on etc.

Overall, I don't think there is a one is better than the other. It 100% depends on what you want to do, what you can afford and if you want a bit more configuration or less.