Poll - How do you box-box communicate?

[hytiek]

While I'm working on a plugin, I thought it best to ask what people are mostly using for box to box communication. I'm biased and don't want to instill my will upon anyone. Vote please!

 

[Redbot]

EQBC because I haven't attempted it with dannet yet.

 

[Inictus]

I've noticed that there are 3 choices on the launcher: EQBCS, EQBCS2 and EQBCSeqmule. What are the differences between them?

To answer the original question - EQBCS.

 

[Allurex]

so eqbcs i run on all.. but my macros run dannate

 

[hytiek]

so eqbcs i run on all.. but my macros run dannate

that's really interesting... Thanks Allurex!

 

[drwhomphd]

I technically run Dannet and EQBC. For any manual commands I use dannet but still use extra mq2 buttons. For whatever reason I really like not having to type the extra forward slash.

 

[Robban]

At the moment I use eqbc for commands, but have tried dannet also. Depends on what macros I use I guess

 

[Many_Whelps]

dannet. I'll even take macros and edit them myself to remove the eqbc calls so I never even have to load eqbc plugin or standalone server rubbish.

 

[TVCChiver]

I'm eqbc just because I know the commands already and a lot of the macros use eqbc anyways.

 

[Rooster]

I've been using DanNet since early when it was release, took a little bit to get used to and I still forget syntax now and again, so many options.. or more evidence I just am slowly losing the plot

It's stable, I've never had it crash/stop working mid way through a session.

Not sure what it'd take to make me change back

 

[BrianGragg]

EQBC still because I have the muscle memory from before Dannet was a thing. I keep telling my self I’m going to make a cheat sheet and switch but alas I’m still using BC.

 

[Sic]

EQBC still because I have the muscle memory from before Dannet was a thing. I keep telling my self I’m going to make a cheat sheet and switch but alas I’m still using BC.

Here's something @sl968 has pinned on discord

 

[Dragonslayer]

Swapped to dannet a while ago and had the feeling, that it runs much smoother and without hassles.
Never went back to eqbc.
@Sic ty for the table, don't remember to have it seen yet.

 

[BrianGragg]

Here's something @sl968 has pinned on discord
View attachment 23950

Perfect!!! Printing it out for quick reference until I remember everything again.

 

[dannuic]

It's kind of interesting, dannet was never made to replace eqbc -- it just kind of has all the features to do so. The real reason to use dannet is the other stuff it provides (observers/queries).

 

[Nadom]

EQBC because it works and i havent seen a reason to try anything else

 

[Rooster]

It's kind of interesting, dannet was never made to replace eqbc -- it just kind of has all the features to do so. The real reason to use dannet is the other stuff it provides (observers/queries).

I mean eqbc along with netbots and netheal worked OK, but the observe/query just blows it all wide open being able to check anything

 

[Secret Santabot]

How do you box-box communicate?

Go to the box 1 screen. Then do a /tell to box two. Then hop on box 2 screen and /r in response to the tell. Now you have box to box communication . Lol

 

[TVCChiver]

Here's something @sl968 has pinned on discord
View attachment 23950

Hell yea thanks sic! I know dannet is really nice to use, I just hated relearning syntax. That chart will come in handy so I can finally try and switch!

 

[drwhomphd]

It's kind of interesting, dannet was never made to replace eqbc -- it just kind of has all the features to do so. The real reason to use dannet is the other stuff it provides (observers/queries).

Not having to type that extra forward slash is surprisingly nice...