Question - UI ENGINE WARNING

[MamaBear]

What is this? Should I do as it says? Was on the accounts this morning? Could not find it on here.
I just looked and the new UI Engine box is not checked, not sure what I should do?

 

[ChatWithThisName]

That's part of the cwtn plugins letting you know that you're using the new UI engine and that it causes some issues with MQ in general.
We do recommend you turn it off.

I was working on MQNearby and forgot to put it in the patch notes.

 

[MamaBear]

That's part of the cwtn plugins letting you know that you're using the new UI engine and that it causes some issues with MQ in general.
We do recommend you turn it off.

I was working on MQNearby and forgot to put it in the patch notes.

Thank youit seems that it is already off in the Display tab do I need to do anything?

 

[ChatWithThisName]

Hmm, Sic added it. I assumed the warning only happened if it was active. @Sic would be able to respond better when he has an opportunity.

 

[MamaBear]

Hmm, Sic added it. I assumed the warning only happened if it was active. @Sic would be able to respond better when he has an opportunity.

Thank you!! Really appreciate your quick response I didn't know if I should even play!

 

[Sic]

Hmm, Sic added it. I assumed the warning only happened if it was active. @Sic would be able to respond better when he has an opportunity.

Hrm yep should be I'll take a look.

You can click to dismiss

Lol - actually, I think I left the value flipped for testing reasons :p

 

[ChatWithThisName]

I'm on it. Will check it out.

 

[ChatWithThisName]

I rebuilt and tested and was able to confirm it was flipped. Will push change and have that sorted. Apologies.

 

[ChatWithThisName]

running a new build now to correct it. Guess it'll also come with some unfinished INI reading code for Nearby

 

[Psy]

Was a great reminder on all my toons to make sure they were not using it =) I looked on each one to be sure.

 

[starhack74]

This is actually pretty dangerous. I knew it was RG side, but I feel sorry if some poor dope reported it to Daybreak and essentially outed themselves.

Much better planning should have went into this through communication in the patch notes, and clear pop-up in game along with an easy radio button to ensure deactivation across all other boxes.

For all the great work you guys do, this one could have been better.....

 

[Lord Sivion]

This is actually pretty dangerous. I knew it was RG side, but I feel sorry if some poor dope reported it to Daybreak and essentially outed themselves.

Much better planning should have went into this through communication in the patch notes, and clear pop-up in game along with an easy radio button to ensure deactivation across all other boxes.

For all the great work you guys do, this one could have been better.....

No. DBG won't directly reference MQ. In fact they don't even allow mentioning it on their forums.

I doubt anyone will make this mistake. If anything, it will cause paranoia about them being discovered using MQ by DBG.

 

[Sic]

This is actually pretty dangerous. I knew it was RG side, but I feel sorry if some poor dope reported it to Daybreak and essentially outed themselves.

Much better planning should have went into this through communication in the patch notes, and clear pop-up in game along with an easy radio button to ensure deactivation across all other boxes.

For all the great work you guys do, this one could have been better.....

Lol. K

I mean you're not wrong. People complain to dbg about other mq features

However your reply sounds like somebody who didn't actually read what the message says because it clearly says in the message mq and talks about frame limiter.

EverQuest also does not use imgui windows.

But ok