Question - ISBoxer for level 125 Shaman, Mage, Bard, Beastlord

[RetNavChief]

Hello all, been messing around with ISBoxer the past two weeks. Any chance someone is willing to share their Shaman, Mage, Bard, and Beastlord setups at level 125? Thank you in advance.

 

[durango773]

ISBoxer

isboxer.com

 

[Mugly]

How well does ISBoxer play with MQ?

 

[Schuckenstein]

ISBoxer is super outdated as far as MQ goes and when I tested it with 50+ clients the performance was terrible. If you're only doing a 6 - box and don't care about 500-700+MB clients then its okay. I've pretty much just resorted to using different EQs and changing the icons to identify whos who.

 

[Mugly]

ISBoxer is super outdated as far as MQ goes and when I tested it with 50+ clients the performance was terrible. If you're only doing a 6 - box and don't care about 500-700+MB clients then its okay. I've pretty much just resorted to using different EQs and changing the icons to identify whos who.

View attachment 68302

Thanks

 

[TVCChiver]

How well does ISBoxer play with MQ?

I've used isboxer/innerspace for over a decade with MQ and have had zero issues with it. It is my preferred boxing method because I love having the ability to see all my toons screens at once.

 

[Schuckenstein]

Like I said, if you are running a 6 box and don't care about your memory/cpu usage then I'm sure isboxer is fine. But for someone who is wanting to really optimize their memory and CPU usage without having 128GB of ram the entire isboxer round robin crap is outdated and doesn't work nearly as well as what's now built into MQ by default. Also unless they have fixed the conflict with MQ Frame limiter it breaks the window switching function so you need to turn that awesome feature off just to use isboxer.

 

[TVCChiver]

Like I said, if you are running a 6 box and don't care about your memory/cpu usage then I'm sure isboxer is fine. But for someone who is wanting to really optimize their memory and CPU usage without having 128GB of ram the entire isboxer round robin crap is outdated and doesn't work nearly as well as what's now built into MQ by default. Also unless they have fixed the conflict with MQ Frame limiter it breaks the window switching function so you need to turn that awesome feature off just to use isboxer.

You can still use framelimiter even with isboxer. The only issue is that you have to set the background fps to 5 or higher to not have any issues switching windows. Can easily cut out massive resources with out having to use a ton of memory. I have a PC (that has like 16gm of ram) that has everything turned off + luclin models using easily under 1k mb of ram. It is possible, just have to turn off everything basically.

 

[durango773]

You can still use framelimiter even with isboxer. The only issue is that you have to set the background fps to 5 or higher to not have any issues switching windows. Can easily cut out massive resources with out having to use a ton of memory. I have a PC (that has like 16gm of ram) that has everything turned off + luclin models using easily under 1k mb of ram. It is possible, just have to turn off everything basically.

can get 500m or less without isb

 

[TVCChiver]

can get 500m or less without isb

Yea with ISboxer I hover about 700 on that PC. My main PC I use about 2k memory per frame, but I have a ton of things turned on lol.

 

[Schuckenstein]

You can still use framelimiter even with isboxer. The only issue is that you have to set the background fps to 5 or higher to not have any issues switching windows. Can easily cut out massive resources with out having to use a ton of memory. I have a PC (that has like 16gm of ram) that has everything turned off + luclin models using easily under 1k mb of ram. It is possible, just have to turn off everything basically.

I mean that compared to my 300 MB per client is a pretty big increase man. I'd say anything over 500 mbs is pretty insane and I remember mine was around 800ish with ISBOXER. What sucks is no one has come up with anything like isboxer that works better with MQ. I'd have no problem paying $50 - $100 a year for this but unfortunately, there isn't anything else on the market. Maybe this is a future project for @grimmier

 

[TVCChiver]

I mean that compared to my 300 MB per client is a pretty big increase man. I'd say anything over 500 mbs is pretty insane and I remember mine was around 800ish with ISBOXER. What sucks is no one has come up with anything like isboxer that works better with MQ. I'd have no problem paying $50 - $100 a year for this but unfortunately, there isn't anything else on the market. Maybe this is a future project for @grimmier

Absolutely agree, I'd gladly pay for something that works like isboxer / innerspace but plays more nicely with each other.