Question - Set Practice

[rouneq]

Trying to understand sets and, more specifically, why my simple set test is failing.

[CODE title="SetTest.mac"]Sub Main
/declare newSet set outer
/echo newSet defined: ${Defined[newSet]}
/echo newSet: ${newSet}
/echo ${newSet.Count}
/invoke ${newSet.Add[testvalue]}
/echo ${newSet.Count}
/return[/CODE]

This results in the output

[MQ2] newSet defined: TRUE
[MQ2] newSet: set outer
[MQ2] NULL
No such 'string' member 'Add'
SetTest.mac@6 (Main): /invoke ${newSet.Add[testvalue]}
[MQ2] NULL

This functional parts of this code was inspired/lifted directly from existing code (rgmercs\lib\rgpull.inc). What am I missing here? I haven't found much in the way of documentation to work from. Maybe there's a source I've missed in my searching.

 

[Coldblooded]

MQ2Collections adds the type set.
So before you run your macro

/plugin mq2collections load

Then it works.

Thanks to Kaen for the answer!

 

[rouneq]

Huh. If that's the answer, I wonder why RGMercs works fine now.

EDIT: And indeed, that does give me better results. Now I'm really curious why RGMercs works at all (sets are a key core to how it manages spells/abilities).

 

[Coldblooded]

Huh. If that's the answer, I wonder why RGMercs works fine now.

EDIT: And indeed, that does give me better results. Now I'm really curious why RGMercs works at all (sets are a key core to how it manages spells/abilities).

RGMercs works because it automatically loads MQ2Collections (since it needs it) in rgutil.inc

 

[rouneq]

Ahh. TIL about noauto. Thanks.