• You've discovered RedGuides, an EverQuest multi-boxing and scripting community 🧙‍♀️⚙️. We want you to play several EQ characters at once, come join us and say hello! 👋

  • A TLP without truebox has thawed (Very Vanilla ready)
    Frostreaver

Toast - Kissassist does significantly less DPS than you manually pressing attack

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't believe people are feeding this Troll post.
#1 your Ini sucks man, this has nothing to do with KA Functionality and everything to do with your proficiency in KA.
#2 A Good player Can and SHOULD beat a KA run char. Not because of a problem with Kiss, or your Ini... But Because if a Good player is behind the wheel they have situational awareness. Until Maskoi and EQmule Make KissAssistAI, This will and should always be the case.
Finally #3 My post is not an attack on EQMule or Maskoi like clearly yours was, I appreciate the 2 of them for everything they do. The Fact that KA can be out preformed isn't a reflection of them, The fact that KissAssist CAN out preform the Majority of EQ players today is fucking Incredible, but it's more a reflection on the players themselves. There simply put are less Really Good EQ players than there once were. We don't need Scientific studies to prove that. Simply put the fact that Servers like Bertox are filled to the brim and Can't complete content a year and half after it's come out is proof of that.

PS- @eqmule & @Maskoi PLEASE MAKE K.A.I. (KissAssist AI)
 
I can't believe people are feeding this Troll post.
#1 your Ini sucks man, this has nothing to do with KA Functionality and everything to do with your proficiency in KA.
#2 A Good player Can and SHOULD beat a KA run char. Not because of a problem with Kiss, or your Ini... But Because if a Good player is behind the wheel they have situational awareness. Until Maskoi and EQmule Make KissAssistAI, This will and should always be the case.
Finally #3 My post is not an attack on EQMule or Maskoi like clearly yours was, I appreciate the 2 of them for everything they do. The Fact that KA can be out preformed isn't a reflection of them, The fact that KissAssist CAN out preform the Majority of EQ players today is fucking Incredible, but it's more a reflection on the players themselves. There simply put are less Really Good EQ players than there once were. We don't need Scientific studies to prove that. Simply put the fact that Servers like Bertox are filled to the brim and Can't complete content a year and half after it's come out is proof of that.

PS- @eqmule & @Maskoi PLEASE MAKE K.A.I. (KissAssist AI)

My post was not an attack on Maskoi, Eqmule or Ctaylor22. I like these people and I even took the time to reach out to all of them (except EQmule, sorry eqmule) yesterday and apologize to them for the collateral damage with this post. I'm sorry that you feel it was, but it really doesn't matter what you think - it matters what my intentions were and I was clear and upfront with them. I've been apologetic with both Maskoi and Ctaylor22 knowing that my post could and probably would upset them and I have been acting in as good faith as possible from the start. Unlike Maskoi who posted, "the only reason people do shitty dps is if they use the INIs on your website". This was a bad faith attack towards me, I said NO such thing about Maskoi, Eqmule or Ctaylor22. He said that with the intention of hurting my feelings - this post was not made with the intention of hurting someone's feelings. None of my posts were. I have not transgressed that line to bad faith personal attacks - but other people have towards me.

If you for some reason think you can mind read my intentions better than me - ok... Sure ya can buddy. If you think you're some sort of mystical mind reader there's no arguing with you. I'm not just going to avoid this topic because it upsets some people. Every topic in human history is guaranteed to upset someone, where should we draw the line? Should we all just forgo communication entirely out of fear we may hurt someone's feelings? Such a ridiculous concept. And what about my feelings? Why is it ok to personally attack me and tell me I am terrible and it's all my fault instead of addressing the argument I took my time to put together? That's fucking stupid, it's obvious you're just virtue signaling.

Glad you agree with me though, that Kissassist can not out perform an actual player.
 
Last edited:
I did create a kissassistAI, it’s called conditions, if u set those up correctly u can absolutely outdps a manual good player. Kiss without conditions will barely beat a bad player.
 
Kiss without conditions will barely beat a bad player.

This is most likely the reason why my Kissassist and almost everyone I knows does shitty DPS. None of us use conditions. I know MQ2Melee does better DPS than Kissassist, what I didn't know is if Conditions use the same speed/perform the same as MQ2Melee. Based on what you have said, I hope it's safe to assume that they do. Thank you, for being honest and saying this. Hopefully now it can put an end to this argument as long as people like @kaen01 , @gSe7eN see what you have to say.

This is progress and literally if someone had just said this we could have skipped all of the personal insults for the whole first page of this thread.

If someone gives me a Kissassist Wizard INI file with conditions, I will test that in comparison to an actual player when I run my experiments again. Also, I will reframe my entire argument stating the importance of conditions and the difference they make.
 
I did create a kissassistAI, it’s called conditions, if u set those up correctly u can absolutely outdps a manual good player. Kiss without conditions will barely beat a bad player.

But what about using deep learning and neural networks to optimize automatic creation of the conditionals? (I’m sure I could come up with more AI buzzwords).

I actually find this thread amusing. Several people say “obviously a human player is better” and the OP is making an argument for why it’s better.

But the entire point of machine learning is that machines CAN do many many tasks better than us. To me it is not logical that a person will do better. A well tuned AI should be able to compete with and beat human players consistently.

I’m new to all these tools though, but I don’t care everything I’ve been able to do so far with MQ2 and Kissassist is great (Thank you!). Though I’m worried writing ini’s and conditionals will start to look like my normal work programming and not a game.
 
But what about using deep learning and neural networks to optimize automatic creation of the conditionals? (I’m sure I could come up with more AI buzzwords).

I actually find this thread amusing. Several people say “obviously a human player is better” and the OP is making an argument for why it’s better.

But the entire point of machine learning is that machines CAN do many many tasks better than us. To me it is not logical that a person will do better. A well tuned AI should be able to compete with and beat human players consistently.

I’m new to all these tools though, but I don’t care everything I’ve been able to do so far with MQ2 and Kissassist is great (Thank you!). Though I’m worried writing ini’s and conditionals will start to look like my normal work programming and not a game.

A fully operational AI with machine learning would be better, unquestionably =P

I'd also definitely agree with you that a computer is almost always better than a player, a computer, even a novice one, can beat the world record chessmaster 10/10 times guaranteed. Without question. If we weren't talking about Kissassist I wouldn't even be making this argument, I assure you.

I'm very thankful for Kissassist and towards those who develop it. I feel bad about making this thread and putting them into the situation that I did - but I am not willing to spare someone's feelings and avoid talking about a difficult subject. It pisses me off how contentious this topic is and people like @Daryldixonurmouth think I am out to get someone when I bring it up - which is exactly why it's a contentious topic. For the first whole page I got nothing but fucking insults and then *I* was accused of operating in bad faith and attacking Maskoi and Eqmule. Are you fucking serious? It amazes me how much virtue signaling there is in this community. Grr argh.

Anyway, I felt the need to rant after being ragged on this whole time.

If Kissassist's conditions attack faster than regular Kissassist then obviously the problem was my INI. If I seemed hardheaded before, because I said it wasn't my INI - it's because everyone was coming at me very hostile, blaming me for lying/spoofing the numbers/sucking/my ini files sucking and everything else. It would have been MUCH more productive if someone had just said "Conditions attack as fast as MQ2 Melee" or "Conditions attack as fast as holy shits/down shits" or "Conditions increased the speed at which Kissassist attacks". That would have solved this whole problem right then and there. It accomplishes a lot fucking more than being rude to me and attacking me.


Now, if conditions ACTUALLY do what EQmule has just said, once I see it for myself, I will gladly admit that Kissassist can and does play better than any real player ever could. I can imagine a scenario where they would be better than a real player, considering I know how useful Holyshits/Downshits are for classes like Berserkers. You'll struggle greatly doing good DPS on a class like a Berserker without Mq2melee and holyshits. The class is just far too fucking spammy.
 
Pretty heated thread... Honestly, I think KA is the shit and I dont care to compare whether it can out perform a real player or not...frankly I dont have 6 real players that want to play eq with me on my time and my schedule. What this software allows for me with EQ is F amazing. Other than looking at everyones position, math, emotional arguments, the real question is .. why does it matter .. why does it matter that KA doesnt out perform a real person if that was even true... What matters to me, personally is it allows me to play a game that requires boxing to progress, and that is F good enough for me. Sorry for all the F bombs..but this is a serious "Come on MAN" moment... Some things just dont matter and are not worth wasting time on. I got other shit to do, like bang through EQ with my box teams loving KA every time it saves my teams arse.
 
Pretty heated thread... Honestly, I think KA is the shit and I dont care to compare whether it can out perform a real player or not...frankly I dont have 6 real players that want to play eq with me on my time and my schedule. What this software allows for me with EQ is F amazing. Other than looking at everyones position, math, emotional arguments, the real question is .. why does it matter .. why does it matter that KA doesnt out perform a real person if that was even true... What matters to me, personally is it allows me to play a game that requires boxing to progress, and that is F good enough for me. Sorry for all the F bombs..but this is a serious "Come on MAN" moment... Some things just dont matter and are not worth wasting time on. I got other shit to do, like bang through EQ with my box teams loving KA every time it saves my teams arse.

cause eq is a game built around min/maxing. If we're trying to determine what is the best way to do a certain thing, this is a discussion that needs to be had. Just because the topic doesn't interest you, doesn't mean it's not worth having.
 
And just like what you just said... just because it matters to you, doesnt mean its worth discussing either.... So what outcome do you want from this...even if .. and I mean even.. if .. you can prove your position.. what then? You going to rewrite the code, going to step into the fire and build the next gen KA, you got the dev chops to even do that ? All discussions, if they are worth having should have an expected outcome and maybe a change...whats your expectation beyond getting offending when people pick apart your hypothesis ? Dont post it if you cant or are not willing to defend it :)
 
And just like what you just said... just because it matters to you, doesnt mean its worth discussing either.... So what outcome do you want from this...even if .. and I mean even.. if .. you can prove your position.. what then? You going to rewrite the code, going to step into the fire and build the next gen KA, you got the dev chops to even do that ? All discussions, if they are worth having should have an expected outcome and maybe a change...whats your expectation beyond getting offending when people pick apart your hypothesis ?

Well, I wasn't getting annoyed about people picking apart my hypothesis. I enjoy when people challenge my ideas - it's why I post them. I was getting annoyed by people personally attacking me. That's rude and accomplishes absolutely nothing. Challenge my idea, don't just call me bad or tell me my INI sucks. I didn't come in here and say Maskoi sucks or EQmule sucks or that they designed a shitty as program. That would of been rude of me and improper. I said, this is what I and all of my friends are experiencing - it is under performing a real player and I don't understand why some people here expect it to perform as good as a real player. Here, I even ran some experiments to prove my hypothesis. What did I get? People freaking the fuck out at me and treating me like shit then blame me for "attacking" others - fucking seriously? I can count on one hand the number of people that treated me with respect in this thread. I may have hurt other people's feelings but that was not my intention and not what I set out to do. Some of the people in this thread definitely set out to hurt my feelings with their comments - that was their only intention; that's the difference.

Also, the entire point of this thread was to learn and improve, my expected outcome was to get to the bottom of this idea one way or another. Eqmule posted above that
Kiss without conditions will barely beat a bad player.

Which means I have learned something entirely new. So has everyone here. Now, in the future, when someone says that they are doing poor DPS with Kissassist, their question can now be answered and resolved instead of either not getting an answer or being lied to and saying Kissassist is just perfect the base way of setting it up.
 
Well frankly, the name of your post kind of set the stage for the battle that ensued. The old saying, if you call someone's baby ugly, you might be called ugly yourself. When I read the name of the post and your initial post, it didnt sound like you were looking to get help with your ini files or advice on how to fix stuff. It seemed that only when you started to get picked apart on your data, you went on the defense and claimed everyone was attacking you. Even some of your quotes and call outs are very very defensive. Now, I am not going to suggest that what others posted too were equally offensive towards you, but it is what it is, being a big boy about it separates the men from the kids... My position is KA is, good is good enough for the game, there is a point when making software improvements that you will simply reach a point of diminishing returns. I have built software for over 25 years as a professional dev and I can tell you once you meet the requirements, it becomes a point of diminishing returns to argue or even enhance a product to meet a requirement, that simply does not matter to the audience, as a whole.
 
I will say, though, that "being lied to and saying Kissassist is just perfect" is not what happens the majority of the time. Most people tell you your ini sucks which, in my opinion, is not a lie. I don't think anyone (including Maskoi) believes KissAssist is perfect. I don't think you need an ini with conditions to beat an average player, but it's going to depend a lot on your class and what "decisions" have to be made to optimize that class. If there are a lot of decision points, conditions matter more. If there are less, conditions matter less.

I thought the multibind experiment was a good experiment. You're not optimizing your play, you're just doing a rotation, KISS can easily beat that if you have a well formed INI. The original INI you posted had holes in it. Not like, "oh, there was some bad stuff" it had holes between DPS chains. Similarly, the timing setup was poor for what spells to prioritize. So, your initial experiment was flawed. It doesn't make the experiment bad, I still think it's a good experiment. But it does make any results you get from it flawed. I mentioned in Discord, you have to compare apples to apples.

The expectation that someone should provide you with a better ini is silly. You wanted to run the experiment and people told you what you needed to change to make it a valid experiment. If you're not willing to do that, that's fine, but you have to be willing to accept that people don't have to prove you wrong nor do they have to accept your results. You were the initial one trying to prove a point, if you want that to be respected then prove it well.

All of that said, you can very much make the argument that coming up with inis for KISS is very hard and time consuming. People have broken inis all the time. There is definitely a tradeoff between flexibility and ease of use. If that's not acceptable there are other macros that you cannot configure that may work better for your style of play. But that STILL doesn't impact the premise of a thread titled "KissAssist Does Significantly Less DPS than You Manually Pressing Attack." You could have titled it "A poor ini in KissAssist Does Significantly Less DPS..." and I don't think anyone would have argued. You could have titled it "Generating a KissAssist INI is harder than learning to play a class" and the premise of the argument would be different. But you can't have it both ways. You made a specific claim and backed it up with poor data. That's okay, give it another shot with the info you've learned and prove you're right. (Because, you may still be, but your experiment was flawed).
 
Well frankly, the name of your post kind of set the stage for the battle that ensued. The old saying, if you call someone's baby ugly, you might be called ugly yourself. When I read the name of the post and your initial post, it didnt sound like you were looking to get help with your ini files or advice on how to fix stuff.

I wasn't, I was trying to shine light on the fact that a reoccuring theme in this community is denying the truth. Like you, I agree Kissassist is great - maybe I took an overly hostile approach with my initial post, I'm far from a perfect person. This is a topic that annoys me because I have had it literally a dozen times with people - like I showed in my initial post, people have freaked out on me and cursed me out multiple times for bringing this up.

My position is KA is, good is good enough for the game, there is a point when making software improvements that you will simply reach a point of diminishing returns. I have built software for over 25 years as a professional dev and I can tell you once you meet the requirements, it becomes a point of diminishing returns to argue or even enhance a product to meet a requirement, that simply does not matter to the audience, as a whole.

I agree with this too mostly. The only reason I want to talk about this topic is because when we're talking about boxing raids, min/maxing is a VERY important aspect of doing it. This game is built around min/maxing. I didn't decide that. In order to have the conversations I want to have we all need to accept some common sense facts, such as, Kissassist's DPS isn't the best. Is that a bad thing? I certaintly don't think so. But apparently other people do - because I get non stop shit for bringing it up.

Most of you have joined this conversation late - so it may look like I am off my rocker too. I'm a man who has been pushed to his limit with this discussion. I'm so tired of people over reacting and calling me names and being rude to me just because I am talking about something they don't want to hear. That probably causes me to over react at times too, for which I can only apologize and admit my own mistakes.
 
I will say, though, that "being lied to and saying Kissassist is just perfect" is not what happens the majority of the time. Most people tell you your ini sucks which, in my opinion, is not a lie. I don't think anyone (including Maskoi) believes KissAssist is perfect. I don't think you need an ini with conditions to beat an average player, but it's going to depend a lot on your class and what "decisions" have to be made to optimize that class. If there are a lot of decision points, conditions matter more. If there are less, conditions matter less.

You're right, it isn't a lie to suggest my INI sucks. As I told EQmule on Skype, he was correct to point out my INI sucks and was the problem - I was wrong. If what he says is true that conditions use the same logic as holyshits/downshits (and attack as fast) - then yes Kissassist can do as good of DPS as a real player in many more situations than I expected.

I thought the multibind experiment was a good experiment. You're not optimizing your play, you're just doing a rotation, KISS can easily beat that if you have a well formed INI. The original INI you posted had holes in it. Not like, "oh, there was some bad stuff" it had holes between DPS chains. Similarly, the timing setup was poor for what spells to prioritize. So, your initial experiment was flawed. It doesn't make the experiment bad, I still think it's a good experiment. But it does make any results you get from it flawed. I mentioned in Discord, you have to compare apples to apples.

The expectation that someone should provide you with a better ini is silly. You wanted to run the experiment and people told you what you needed to change to make it a valid experiment. If you're not willing to do that, that's fine, but you have to be willing to accept that people don't have to prove you wrong nor do they have to accept your results. You were the initial one trying to prove a point, if you want that to be respected then prove it well.

All of that said, you can very much make the argument that coming up with inis for KISS is very hard and time consuming. People have broken inis all the time. There is definitely a tradeoff between flexibility and ease of use. If that's not acceptable there are other macros that you cannot configure that may work better for your style of play. But that STILL doesn't impact the premise of a thread titled "KissAssist Does Significantly Less DPS than You Manually Pressing Attack." You could have titled it "A poor ini in KissAssist Does Significantly Less DPS..." and I don't think anyone would have argued. You could have titled it "Generating a KissAssist INI is harder than learning to play a class" and the premise of the argument would be different. But you can't have it both ways. You made a specific claim and backed it up with poor data. That's okay, give it another shot with the info you've learned and prove you're right. (Because, you may still be, but your experiment was flawed).

I realize the original INI I posted had literal holes in it. It doesn't say anywhere that causes problems with Kissassist though, I see people do that in their INI files all the time. That's also partly what I was arguing about - everyone was expecting me to have a perfect INI file, despite not realizing that almost no one uses a perfect INI file. I don't know anyone that uses Kissassist ingame that actually uses holyshits/downshits or conditions (aside from melee). I was making an apples to apples comparison, it just wasn't the comparison you and everyone else wanted. I was compairing two very realistic scenarios to prove the point that I was trying to make. I already know that Kissassist, using holyshits does more DPS than Kissassist without. I also already know MQ2melee does better DPS than Kissassist. All people that play melee classes I know that raid use MQ2melee; but NO ONE I know who raids uses Kissassist. Hence my rudeness/insistence on this being common knowledge. I didn't understand why we were still having this argument when half the community accepts it as common sense but the other half says no I am full of shit. That's what my math was intended to prove. I wasn't trying to imply Kissassit could N-E-V-E-R do good DPS, but rereading my initial post - maybe I did inadvertently imply that.

I agree with you that it would have been better for me to take a different approach, or to title my thread/argument differently. I'm definitely partly responsible for the over reaction I received and I can accept that.
 
Last edited:
I was making an apples to apples comparison, it just wasn't the comparison you and everyone else wanted. I was compairing two very realistic scenarios to prove the point that I was trying to make. I already know that Kissassist, using holyshits does more DPS than Kissassist without. I also already know MQ2melee does better DPS than Kissassist. All people that play melee classes I know that raid use MQ2melee; but NO ONE I know who raids uses Kissassist.

In your opinion you were making an apples to apples comparison, but in my opinion you were not. They are both valid opinions. As far as the comparison I wanted -- I don't care one way or the other, I was just pointing out that your methodology was flawed. You have the opinion that people don't know how to setup or download good ini files. It may be accurate, but it doesn't make a comparison apples to apples any more than me having the opinion that the majority of EQ players are too dumb to hit the "1" key over and over makes a comparison accurate.

You have stated many things that you KNOW are true, but none of the proof which is what your first post was working towards. I support your beliefs and you can choose to believe whatever you would like, but if you would like to convince others that you are correct, it doesn't matter what you know or what your experiences are. If you would like to convince others that you are correct, an accurate experiment with reproducible results should be your goal. Right now you're giving your opinion and judgment _as if they are facts_ which is different from _being facts_ even if it feels factual to you. That's okay, you're free to do that and that may be your goal. But if you are actually trying to prove something, then stop telling people what you know to be true and provide evidence that suggests why it's better.

If I were to raid I would prefer MQ2Melee because I would want to control my character (but not have to remember to hit buttons) since KissAssist was not built for raids. It doesn't say one is better than the other in any scenario other than preference. You can use the phrase like "All people that play" and "Everyone I know" and "All of my knowledge and experience suggests" but it doesn't prove the assertion that you put forth. If you would like to shift an opinion you either need to be very charismatic or have proof (and sometimes with humans that isn't even enough, but if you offered me an accurate study I would at least say -- "That is an accurate study and something to consider." Versus me just telling you, with no bias or ill intent, that the study was flawed.)

You may do with that information what you will.
 
Well part of it would be an INI change. The reason I stand firm on this, and I won't get into the can of worms that you'd get from "conditions", but you can set things up so that they are in a sequential order based on GCD timings, so that when KA gets to the next spell at whatever %, you have a greater chance that spell is ready and wont be skipped. If you just simply put |100|weave on everything, it will cast something that is either not on GCD or is the first one it comes across on the spellbar. By putting dpson=2 and different %'s on things, that forces KA to look at them all seperately, and cast them in sequential order, not based on what the mobs HP is at. I could pick this apart all day, and looks like everyone else can too. But I think this would be a good start and provide some sort of increase in dps.
 
Joojoo, there is a forum section specifically for INI's. You will find them in there. We will not post them in random discussion threads, because it is not the correct place for them. They would be lost in obscurity and may only be found by some who actually use the search feature.

Apart from that, we may post relevant snippets for the sake of troubleshooting purposes.

Thanks Frimp. I think if you do a quick search on the forums you will note I've been around a while. I ain't a total newb. ;)

As Lurk says-- a lot of people in this thread (and others) claim all kinds of wondrous DPS (ahem, a certain Ragefire server guy... cough Synk), but leave me with blue balls since they don't post any proof... or inis.

JJB
 
Our raids on Ragefire (almost all 12-18 boxers) are the highest dps parses I have ever seen for GoD, OoW, and DoN fights, and the entire guild uses kiss10 or kiss11. We have finely tuned .ini files, some use holys\downs, some manually hit their burns. Personally I use a blend of manually calling the burn section of KA and holies and I do fine. I think this thread can simply be summed up by saying, you should use mq2melee & EoKnuke if you want to min\max dps with Kiss11, that's pretty much it.

I will agree sometimes Kiss CAN be slow to engage (we all have manual engage keys in case it is slow), and the burn section does not fire well on it's own but having it fire on anything MQ2 considers a named is a huge mistake anyways. Whenever we get around to doing DoDh I'll try to remember to come back here. Our full burn raid DPS in GoD was around 40k, in OoW around 50k, everything was completely trivial and everyone uses kiss now (a few switched over from other bots).

Synk-- please post your inis if you and your guildies are of a mind. Asked with love.

JJB
 
In your opinion you were making an apples to apples comparison, but in my opinion you were not. They are both valid opinions.

The opinions are not both valid. I followed the steps of the Scientific Method when presenting my argument: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

You have the right to disagree with the Scientific Method, be my guest. But that doesn't make your opinion valid. I defined my argument, defined my experiment, said which variables I was accounting for and ran an experiment. Then I published my results.

You can say that my entire test was retarded because my argument was retarded. That's perfectly acceptable. (even though EQmule has since said that my argument was correct ... "base" kissassist (my parameters) will do less DPS than a real player. His response kind of defeats the entire purpose of us even arguing about this now....) But you can't say that I wasn't making an apples to apples comparison because *I* defined the parameters of *my* experiment.
 
By that argument - you could "scientifically prove" any hypothesis based on the variables you defined and your presupposed premise because a flawed experiment that results in the intended data adheres to your view of the scientific method.

This is not the scientific method, but you have the right to your opinion. We can agree to disagree.
 
great walls of text, dudes, it all comes down to one thing, and has nothing to do with conditions.

If we want to know who is best at keeping a certain rotation of spells timed correctly for when they ready. kiss will come out on top everytime.

a human does not have the ability to keep the same control going relentless for a while like a computer macro can and will.

you all keep talking about oh there is situations where humans are better cause of this and that, yes, hte maacro aint programmed or set up to handle all situations. its made to fire your rotation so you dont have to.

the way almar conducted his test was flawed, bad setup of clients, bad setup of ini, broken dps counter.

do you see my point?

i have grouped and run dps counters on alot of groups, and no oee has done exceptionaly good dps unless they been running some sort of automation.
 
Player A does more dps than Player B. Player A spends time researching proper ways to produce the highest dps. Player B doesn't put in the same time and effort to acquire the same knowledge as Player A.

You are Player A, you spent the time manually playing your character in a fashion that you know will produce high dps. Player B is your kissassist ini that you did not take the time to properly research and setup to maximum efficiency like you did with your human played character.

Of course Player A will out dps Player B in this scenario. Why would you ever expect anything else?

The counter argument to this seems to be that "well a lot people don't run with a maximum efficient ini" which is probably right, and a lot of people also play their characters very horribly manually. However that isn't what you are trying to compare, as you've said yourself this is about min/max. You are trying to compare someone playing manually at high efficiency, it is unfair to expect that you would not do the same for the counterpart by creating a high efficiency ini.
I don't think anything presented here is even close to hard proof that manual play produces higher dps than kissassist. I don't really care which produces higher dps personally, but I mean if you want to present this argument, do it right or why bother in the first place.
 
Could change the title to, “Knowledgeable player hits button better than out of the box Kissassist”.
 
Curious is there a simple Keybinding macro out here any where ?? One that would spam a set key of where all your regular macros are ?? I have 1 hotbar with only macros and spells , all set to my number 4 key . So is there something that will detect that i have engaged in melee within a certain range and then start spamming my (number 4 ) key then stop when it detects mob is dead. The one i have all my hot buttons assigned to so as i am spamming it pretty much just using first available rather it be skill,alt activate , or spell .
 
Or better yet can you add /slash commands to a KA.ini or is that pretty much the melee.ini .... ugh nvm just answered my own ?????? Thanks hehe
 
tip for those players that suck and blame kiss 💋 (a) update to kiss 11 (b) clean out your ini's (c) if not using kiss11.003+ conditions use them.
this should make you fight better than average Joe at killing mobs.

1 last thing to think about when it comes to kiss.
Imagine trying to do everything your gonna try with kiss manually. And then imagine how much easier it is with kiss. Then remember kiss isn't perfect but its the best we got at the moment for what it does.

And I stand by what maskoi said 100% kiss 10 should be totally abandoned after kiss11 is released. So people can't parse shit using the slower kiss 10 then tell us that all kiss is slow.
 
Just a suggestion, if you're going to invest time in an opinionated forum post (or any medium), take the time to include solid and clear references to the overall argument supposedly taking place so those of us without background knowledge can have some context to follow.

It's not that I don't understand what you're saying, but rather I haven't heard or seen anyone making this claim that kiss is better dps so this post seems irrelevant.

It's really not enough to say "people are saying this". Who? Your mailman? A 12 year old? Is Eqmule saying it? What are they saying exactly?

There's no context given so I can see how this does come off like a troll post to be honest.
 
Let me stir the pot some!

While this post is true in my humble opinion for one toon...but, if you are boxing 6 toons without MQ I doubt that holds true. I think the overall dps would be greater for the 6 man group running MQ than the 6 man group that is not and being boxed by 1 person.
 
Let me stir the pot some!

While this post is true in my humble opinion for one toon...but, if you are boxing 6 toons without MQ I doubt that holds true. I think the overall dps would be greater for the 6 man group running MQ than the 6 man group that is not and being boxed by 1 person.

I’ll see your pot stir and raise you another...

He didn’t say with MQ2 versus without MQ2... he specifically said the macro kissassist :)
 
kiss is a macro that you get out of it based on what you put into it, people didn't just boot up kiss and it was optimized in all abilities and combat routines. Kiss is just a macro that has the ability to run any class, its not auto_clr, a macro created to run one class. People put weeks and months into their kiss ini settings to make them work best based on their group makeup and sometimes they perform optimized for the group makeup they run and won't work for everyone. I don't care if people agree or disagree with me, what happens happens. Parsing your toon is nice but the true metric is this "can you kill what you wanted to kill?" if you answer no then tweak or ask for help, but if you answer yes then kiss works for you. Its also true kiss will not outperform a real player with knowledge of their class, hands down no contest. Kiss just allows people to bot toons with little knowledge of the class based on people's ini's. The same argument you have with kiss can also be made about modbot/auto mac/core/and any custom macro right out of the box without tweaking and knowledge of the class. Some work better but have limiting factors that decrease that human response under normal circumstances. Anyways my rant is done and im not saying your wrong, just saying more is at play than what your original argument had stated.
 
On my beastlord I honestly can't out do kiss very long so many buttons to press. Even if there was a 10% gap between me and kiss that gap is gone the first time I go to the bathroom not to mention get lazy get water tab to porn. Also my kiss beastlord out performs other beasties that I meet out in the wild by a big margin.

Then ontop of that I'm boxing other characters I couldn't even box all of them well without kiss or another macro. I would not get 100% out of my beastlord using isboxer, mezzing with my bard while tanking on my warrior and doing shaman stuff on the shaman.
 
On my beastlord I honestly can't out do kiss very long so many buttons to press. Even if there was a 10% gap between me and kiss that gap is gone the first time I go to the bathroom not to mention get lazy get water tab to porn. Also my kiss beastlord out performs other beasties that I meet out in the wild by a big margin.

Then ontop of that I'm boxing other characters I couldn't even box all of them well without kiss or another macro. I would not get 100% out of my beastlord using isboxer, mezzing with my bard while tanking on my warrior and doing shaman stuff on the shaman.

Well, that's partly because you chose a Beastlord - you can't really effectively box melee without MQ2. Almost all melee I know that do good DPS, depend on MQ2melee or some other fast attacking MQ2 plugin/macro. I have tried doing good DPS on a melee character by manually attacking and it's a bloody nightmare, I agree 100%.

The argument isn't that you can play better than Kissassist (although I do think you can; that's not the basis of this argument), it's that you can do more damage than Kissassist by manually attacking, manually popping your burns when needed. You can let KISS do everything else, so long as you manually attack and manually pop burns you WILL notice a BIG dps increase. With melee, popping your burns manually and not depending on Kissassist will give you a massive DPS increase since Melee burns are so short and Kissassist pops them slow as fuuuuuuuuuck. Some of my Beastlord's burns only last 30 seconds, Kissassist takes at lesat 10 seconds to pop all of my burns which means 1/3 of my burns are completely wasted.

For classes like Beastlords/Berserkers/Bards - I guess the best advice I could give to improve your DPS is depend more on MQ2melee than Kissassist, unless Kissassist attacks faster with conditions as Eqmule said. I don't use melee characters on my box team because they suck so badly when playing them with Kissassist and I am too lazy/retarded to setup MQ2melee.


kiss is a macro that you get out of it based on what you put into it.

I dislike this argument because it's saying, "well if you setup KA like a pro or know how to code very well, it works great!" when almost no one in this community properly uses KA nor knows how to code very well. Even the people who created kissassist don't share their INI files to give examples of right vs wrong.... It's just my personal opinion as someone else who creates things for the community - blaming the users for misusing the macro you fail to properly explain or code is nothing short of ignorance mixed with arrogance. It's why I always gave ChatWithThisName shit for calling people retarded when they bugged out his macro.... No, the person who created it is retarded for not accounting for that problem. As a creator, that's your responsibility - if you create something and EVERYONE misuses it - it's not their fault, it's yours.

I agree more is at play than what my original argument states though, Kissassist has its uses and so do many other macros, absolutely. I use Kiss every day and love it - but that doesn't change the fact that it does terrible DPS when compared to a real player. When I play the game, 99.9% of the time I depend solely on Kissassist. When I do a mission or something "hard" I know that I need to turn Kissassist off and depend on myself... Or at the very least just spam the attack button/heal button while I am fighting mobs.

Note: By a "real player" I do mean someone 6 boxing, 12 boxing, 18 boxing. I manually control my entire box team and I can do it better than any sort of automation ever could. Not because I am good but because I practiced. You can also still play with Kissassist and increase your DPS - all you need to do is make a button for manually attacking and two buttons for popping cooldowns. When I say "real player" that's all I mean. Someone who is pressing a single button at about 120 BPM and someone who can press once button every 30 minutes or every time you're about to fight a named enemy to pop your burns.


Just a suggestion, if you're going to invest time in an opinionated forum post (or any medium), take the time to include solid and clear references to the overall argument supposedly taking place so those of us without background knowledge can have some context to follow.

I added a few pictures of people who have confronted me on this idea before, as well as links to previous posts where I had a similar argument. I do agree though, I could have worded my argument better. I'll probably be making another post once they fix gamparse where I ONLY link parses. I'll leave *my* drama out of it to prevent more drama from happening in the thread =P

I'm taking personal responsibility for all the drama that happened in this thread. I worded my post like an asshole and I should have focused more on the numbers than on the "drama" of the issue. It's my fault this thread got so out of control. There are some people though that will never be convinced no matter how much is posted, such as Kaen below:


you all keep talking about oh there is situations where humans are better cause of this and that, yes, hte maacro aint programmed or set up to handle all situations. its made to fire your rotation so you dont have to.

Your arguments are always stupid, provide no evidence aside from anecdotal and you refuse to accept anyone elses evidence. You're a perfect example of someone who solely forms his opinions on his own emotions and refuses to accept factual evidence. I guess I should stop trying to argue with you about this subject.... Because you can't reason someone out of a position they weren't reasoned into.
 
Last edited:
Toast - Kissassist does significantly less DPS than you manually pressing attack
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Cart