• You've discovered RedGuides, an EverQuest multi-boxing and scripting community 🧙‍♀️⚙️. We want you to play several EQ characters at once, come join us and say hello! 👋

  • A TLP without truebox has thawed (Very Vanilla ready)
    Frostreaver

Question - Does Rk. II need to really be included?

Joined
Oct 3, 2019
RedCents
1,883¢
Hi All,

I'm new to kissassist and I'm gathering macros to test. Using the latest kissassist, is it mandatory to spell out "Rk. II" everywhere for all buffs/spells/conditions/gems in the ini file? I plan on boxing a full grp of 110s and all my toons have full Rk. II, some even Rk. III spells. I so far tested my druid and she still seems to be finding the buffs to cast even though I haven't explicitly mentioned then as Rk. II in the buff lines. However, I just want to make sure in advance nothing is amiss. Thank you for your time :)
 
Awesome! That's what I almost kind of thought by inspecting a dozen ini files in the library. Thank you so much for the speedy response :)
 
Question - Does Rk. II need to really be included?

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Cart