Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You've discovered RedGuides 📕 an EverQuest multi-boxing community 🛡️🧙🗡️. We want you to play several EQ characters at once, come join us and say hello! 👋
IS THIS SITE UGLY? Change the look. To dismiss this notice, click the X --->
edqtrader74 you said " Ranger/Rog can put out big DPS if you stay on humanoids within their Assassinate/Headshot level range " My 86 shaman has Feralization but I don't know if that makes the ranger a better choice compared to zerker.
Airemus we use KA. Eqtrader74 it seems the Zerker is the way to go. Now I must read and decide if we will save significant time by creating the cleric and zerker now compared to waiting until 100; the amount of time required to raise a 85 to 100.
Thanks for your input.
At 86 my son plays a warrior and boxes a bard and I play a shaman and box a mage. We have 2 healer mercs that are rank 5. Neither one of us has ever been level 100 in this game.
From comments I have received I believe that by 100 or lower we must replace the 2 mercs with a cleric and a high DPS...
My mage will cast one nuke and then no more nukes. I will include my ini file hopefully someone can detect my error. Working on my first ini file for my mage. I am testing with the training dummy which is considered a named mob. No errors occur. TIA
[General]
KissAssistVer=11.005
Role=Assist...
DPSOn=1 and |Once . I will be creating my first KA ini file next week. It is obvious that many players have devoted time to improving this macro. Big thanks to all of them.
Thank you Nihil. Now I only need to learn the macro syntax to determine if the buff/debuff took and if it did not cast again and set a number on retries.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.